Changes between Version 24 and Version 25 of Ideas

Timestamp:

11/23/09 14:07:06 (15 years ago)

Author:

kiesel

Comment:

ST updates

Ideas

@@ -5 +5 @@
      * pro: less resource consumption, proper diff handling
      * needs lots of rewriting
-   * One Model per Skipforward webapp (new). Many users per Skipforward webapp (done).
+   * One Model per Skipforward webapp (new). Many users per Skipforward webapp (done). Use TDB? Use named graphs for what facet?
      * pro: Less resource consumption (memory/filetransfers)
      * con: Syncer needs to know with whom to sync. Not trivial (what if one user moves from SF server A to SF server B?). Privacy issues (FactsDb needs to check resources it accesses against namespaces that are supposed to be visible to the user - has to trust XMPP server).
+   * use Beans instead of JSON for ST models (fix String vs. HTML escaping ugliness in the process)
  * '''User interface'''
-   * Plain HTML pages for item/feature instances, just for browsing and linked data
-     * For ''Recommendation'': List of recommended items
-     * Allow annotating items via HTML pages
+   * use ST pages for linked data HTML view
+   * overview ST page for user
+   * ST navigation bar
+   * ST annotation wizard
+   * allow some simple HTML in comments (<i>,<a href=... skip=bool>)
+   * Bugs
+     * viewing a feature pointing at another "thing" gives you no way to open this thing. 
+     * having to click on a thing before it can be added as a feature value is not really intuitive, and never explained. 
  * '''Annotating items'''
    * Rules for deducing features (per-user basis, let user confirm generated feature instances)
@@ -34 +40 @@
    * simple skipinions ontology editor - 2 weeks
    * update and synchronize ontologies (and facts!) on peers - 3-8 weeks
- * '''User interface'''
-   * proper search/view/enter
-   * evaluation
-   * viewing a feature pointing at another "thing" gives you no way to open this thing. 
-   * the ST-view does not show the value of features, i.e. shows "writtenBy", but not who it was. 
-   * having to click on a thing before it can be added as a feature value is not really intuitive, and never explained. 
 
 == Implementation details ==